I also tend to evaluate of Dumbledore as a Mr Chips type engrave. He was someone who loved passionately once (perhaps unwisely) and then suffered. It also goes someway towards explaining why he was wary of Tom Riddle -- namely that his pursuit of knowledge echoed Grimwald's. Or was it his own and he knew what dark passages it could bring about to if unchecked. In many ways it doesn't be as the main story would have comfort played the same as the end prove is the same. But it does through up an intriguing question -- authors undergo to know much more about their world than readers do should they overlap that knowledge? Or should it be something that readers if they want to can fill in the blanks? And when should that knowledge be shared? Because sometimes if the author is going to create verbally more stories about that particular milieu the author could need to keep secrets. When I am writing. I do experience why other characters are in the cast and what their backgrounds are. The tip of the iceberg principle. I do a lot of investigate on both the setting and the characters that populate the worlds I write about. It is always a juggling act - -what does the author need to know and what does the reader. For example with
I ended up experience all about Lucy and Henry Charlton's courtship and the Charlton family dynamics. This held me in good stead when I came to create verbally Lottie's story (comfort untitled but ordain apparently have the word Debutante in it and possibly scandal). BUT the information does not really impact on the story and readers do not be the info to apply the story. In fact if they did know the info the cerebrate would be lost and the walk would slow to a crawl. Hopefully the knowledge I have ultimately makes the world more real to the reader. However if the end prove stays the same does the motivation of a secondary engrave be to anyone beyond the author?I would lay out very strenuously that an compose needs to know the motivations of their secondaries in particular their study secondaries if they want to forbid two dimensional characters and flat worlds but should they show it afterwards? Is preliminary work interesting or distracting? Or does it be on the author and the schedule? I am undecided about it but there again. I am a writer and I like to play guessing games about characters. I am blogging at today about preparing for Christmas and am giving away a copy of
First of all congrats on the review. SO happy for you!Secondly you were the first person to hit me with the "You be to know this but the reader doesn't" which goes transfer in hand with "It was a scene you had to write but not one the reader has to see". It has been a revelation. I do a lot more shuffling and cutting now because I will write a scene and know it doesn't bring home the bacon but I had to create verbally it because it made me see something that DOES need to be there. And you would be proud... I just said that very thing in a critique I did. :-)
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://michellestyles.blogspot.com/2007/11/secondary-characters-and-info.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
